Europa!

NASA scientists recently announced they are planning a mission to Jupiter's icy moon, Europa, to find out if the distant moon is capable of supporting life.  While the mission is only in the concept stage, and is years away from realization, it shows that NASA is seriously thinking beyond Mars for the potential of life in the solar system.

Jupiter's icy moon, Europa, as seen from the Voyager spacecraft (NASA).

The proposed mission would launch two landers in 2020, and each would be laden with 36 kg of scientific equipment.  Included would be seismometers to measure any seismic activity on the moon, as well as spectrometers to search for organic molecules and the building blocks of life.  It has been speculated that Europa might harbor life, as the moon is covered in a thick crust of ice, and some miles down may in fact have a giant ocean of liquid water.  Just last month scientists discovered there may even be shallow lakes of water right beneath the surface.

Any mission to the Europan surface would have to be a relatively quick one.  Jupiter constantly bombards the moon with massive amounts of radiation.  Without the aid of radiation shielding, a lander couldn't be guaranteed to last more than seven days on the surface of Europa, and mission scientists aren't interested in sacrificing scientific equipment for heavy radiation shielding.  Still, seven days could provide a bounty of information on the mysterious world.

Artist's conception of a lander approaching the Europan surface (futureplanets.blogspot.com)

With a potential price tag of $800 million, this proposed Europa mission would likely cost more than NASA's recent, inexpensive, New Frontiers missions, which usually run around $400 million.  However, it would likely be less expensive than a so-called 'flagship' mission, which can run into the many billions of dollars.  There had been some talk of a potential flagship Europa orbiter mission, in which NASA would have teamed up with the European Space Agency for two Jupiter system orbiters.  However, recent budget constraints have most likely killed the American portion of that mission (the ESA may continue the project without NASA support).

A mission to explore the habitability of the far flung moons of our solar system is inevitable.  Europa and Ganymede both contain large amounts of water, and Jupiter's gravitational pull may create enough friction to keep some of that water in a liquid state.  Saturn's moon Titan, which was visited by the Huygens probe back in 2005 as part of the Cassini mission, is also a prime candidate for life.  Titan is covered in lakes of hydrocarbons, and indeed has an entire climate system based on liquid methane and ethane in which life forms might flourish.  I do hope that NASA makes visiting these worlds a priority, as unlocking their secrets will undoubtedly lead to a greater understanding of how our solar system formed, and possibly reveal whether or not life ever evolved on a planet other than our own.

Phobos-Grunt Update - Promising News!

After more than two weeks stuck in Earth orbit, Russian flight engineers have finally made contact with the Phobos-Grunt spacecraft.  In a last ditch effort to save the 165 million dollar mission, the Russian space agency, Roskosmos, elicited the help of the European Space Agency and attempted to contact Phobos-Grunt using ground station antennas in Perth, Australia.  Miraculously, contact with the ill-fated spacecraft was established.  After several more passes over Perth, telemetry data was downloaded, and Russian engineers began deciphering the coded data.  Why, exactly, contact couldn't be made up until now isn't yet known, however it appears that the solar arrays of the spacecraft were in an optimal position while it was over Perth, and the extra energy generated allowed for Phobos-Grunt to communicate with Earth.  It still remains unclear what exactly caused the failure of the orbital engine burns, but further analysis of the data and continued contact with the spacecraft will most likely allow engineers to discover the problem.

Phobos-Grunt mission poster (Roskosmos).

Now the question becomes - if Phobos-Grunt can be saved, what to do with it?  The window to send the spacecraft to Mars appears to now be closed, although some debate on this matter remains.  If, indeed, it is too late to try for Mars, the mission may still be salvaged.  One option is to keep the spacecraft in Earth orbit for another two years, until the launch window for Mars again opens, and then send it on its way.  Although, there may not be enough fuel on board for this.  The other option is to completely change the mission objectives, and send the spacecraft to a near Earth asteroid.  The parameters of the mission would essentially be the same, as Phobos is thought to be an asteroid that was captured by Mars's gravity.  So landing on an asteroid, and launching the soil recovery capsule, wouldn't be outside the abilities of the spacecraft.  However, it would take new software and new calculations, and a completely new flight path - and that too could take some time.  Of course any of these options require that enough data can be downloaded from the spacecraft to isolate the initial problem, and then that problem must be fixed.

If Phobos-Grunt cannot be salvaged, it will burn up upon re-entry into Earth's atmosphere on or about January 15th, 2012.  Read more here.